Bad character evidence is evidence of, or a disposition towards misconduct. The courts have been very reluctant to admit bad character evidence as a matter of course because of the fear that, if a jury knew of a. Character evidence is a term used in the law of evidence to describe any testimony or document submitted for the purpose of proving that a person acted in a particular way on a particular occasion based on the character or disposition of that person. The view that bad character evidence could be prejudicial to the defend ant was also held by english criminal law this is in contrast to continental europe where the court is routinely informed about the previous convictions of the defendant, where the general rule was that.
Bad character can also include other discreditable conduct, for example evidence that a defendant is a liar could show that he is dishonest. It is often the case that the prosecution will try to put previous convictions before a jury to persuade them of the defendants guilt. Proof or attestations about an individuals moral standing, general nature, traits, and reputation in the general community. Understanding and using character evidence in federal court.
Evidence of bad character practice and procedure it is clear that evidence of bad character will play a much greater role in investigations in the future and is likely to form an essential part of the evidence against a defendant as bad character is relevant to credit as well as to the issue of guilt. The law of evidence embraces issues of obtaining evidence before trial, adducing evidence at trial, and applying and assessing evidence in the proof or disproof of an individuals litigation. In criminal cases, a defendant might attempt to reduce the possibility that he or she will be. Adducing evidence is the legal term for presenting or producing evidence in court for the purpose of establishing proof. Under section 197 of the criminal procedure act 1977 the grounds upon which the accused may be crossexamined to show bad character.
It sometimes refers to that which is adduced by a party at the trial as a means of establishing factual claims. Therefore, it appears that as bad character would be admissible if the prosecution finds out as previous conviction. At the risk of becoming annoyingly repetitive, let me speak even. But would you be allowed to put that evidence before the jury. The admissibility of bad character evidence coventry university. After the accused places the victims character in issue, the prosecutor may offer rebuttal evidence on that same trait. The criminal procedure rules 2010 part 35 form author. Evidence of the bad character of a person other than d is bad character in criminal proceedings means evidence of, or of a disposition towards, misconduct. Then in criminal proceedings we are looking at the character of the. May 10, 2017 meanwhile under gateway b, it states that bad character evidence is admissible when the evidence is adduced by the defendant himself or is given in an answer to a question asked by him in crossexamination and intended to elicit it. Unless the accused puts the matter in issue by adducing evidence of his good character, the prosecution is not ordinarily entitled to lead evidence solely for purpose of proving his character to be bad. The criminal justice act 2003 applicable in england and wales, and to a lesser extent scotland and northern ireland, implemented fundamental changes to the. Character evidence, prior conduct, and habit april 2010. If step 1 is satisfied, you must then determine whether the character trait evidence is being offered to show that the person acted, on.
Bad character and the leave requirement 107 defining evidence of bad character the options considered in the consultation paper 8. Is evidence of bad character admissible in criminal trials. Generally, under the federal rules of evidence 607, 608, and 609, character evidence can be used to attack witnesses credibility reputation for truthfulness, within limits. Art 82c ppce gateway one misconduct means the commission of an offence or other reprehensible behaviour. Cja satisfy its purpose, and has that purpose made for a more robust and effective criminal. The criminal justice act 2003 do the bad character.
Evidence about ds character in criminal case is admissible to show he possesses a character trait inconsistent w the crime charged, but must pass through two doors usually only defendant can open them rule. Aug 18, 2016 by vida simpeh the criminal justice act 2003 makes provision to allow the prosecution or a codefendant to rely on the bad character of the accused as evidence to prove either the defendants guilt or untruthfulness. Problem 5 defendant charged with kidnapping and other offenses. Evidence of bad character is permitted in these circumstances under section 1011fg of the cja 2003, gateway f and g respectively. Good character evidence and trial preparation vhs fletchers. State laws generally mirror the federal rules, and sometimes provide additional exceptions that permit the use of character evidence. If defendant opens door to his character evidence, then p can rebut w character evidence. The criminal justice act 2003 do the bad character provisions. Application to exclude evidence of a defendants bad character, crimpr 21.
The crown is prohibited from adducing evidence of extrinsic misconduct of the accused. Ds bad character section 1011 gateway g section 1011 g allows for the admission of evidence of bad character where a defendant has made an attack on another persons character. The reason given for this new restraint was to limit pointless crossexamination of witnesses. This question is concern with rules relating to the admissibility of defendants bad character and also the fairness of the changes made by cja 2003. The admissibility of bad character evidence is set out in sections 98 to 1 criminal justice act 2003 cja 2003 which applies to all criminal proceedings begun on or after 4 april 2005 section 141 criminal justice act 2003, see archbold chapter. The accused may offer evidence of a pertinent trait of character of the victim that is material to the crime. Nov 19, 2009 is the evidence of character trait being offered to show action in conformity with character, i. Procedures of evidence have evolved over the last three hundred years to forbid the use of particular evidence in court. Evidence of good character isnt allowed for the purpose of arguing that the defendant committed the crime, but shouldnt be convicted. Once admitted, the weight to be attached to bad character evidence is a matter for the jury, subject to the judges power to stop a case where the evidence is contaminated see section 107 below. There certainly is such a thing as character evidence i. The jury should be given a clear statement of the limited purpose of permitting. The evidence of character refers to evidence which tends to show that a particular witness is of a good or bad character. When i started my practice in 2009, i asked an oldtimer somebody who had been practicing in d.
By vida simpeh the criminal justice act 2003 makes provision to allow the prosecution or a codefendant to rely on the bad character of the accused as evidence to prove either the defendants guilt or untruthfulness. The pros and cons of introducing character evidence in d. Admissibility of hearsay evidence in criminal proceedings. It covers the defendants bad character and excluding evidence of the defendants bad character. Evidence offered to prove the sexual disposition or behavior of the alleged victim may be admissible in criminal cases only in specific instances, such as where evidence of specific instances of sexual behavior by the victim is offered to prove that a person other than the accused was the source of semen, injury, or other physical evidence, or when specific instances of sexual behavior between. A character witness is an individual who testifies as to the habits and reputation of another person. The bad character of nondefendants bloomsbury professional. Art 82a evidence is important explanatory evidence if. When we talk about good character and bad character for the purpose of this chapter, we are referring to character of parties, for civil claimant, plaintiff and defence, if it is a criminal case we are dealing with the reputation and disposition of the accused mainly as well as the prosecutorvictim. The courts have been very reluctant to admit bad character evidence.
A party who wants to introduce evidence of a defendants bad character must comply with the procedural requirements, including the giving of notice in the prescribed. Bad character evidence royal commission into institutional. Under s 99 the criminal justice act 2003 cra 2003, evidence of bad character is defined as evidence of or disposition towards, misconduct. Character evidence legal definition of character evidence. Based on this subsection, such evidence would be admissible when accused adducing his own bad character. Character evidence not admissible to prove conduct. Is the evidence of character trait being offered to show action in conformity with character, i. Meanwhile under gateway b, it states that bad character evidence is admissible when the evidence is adduced by the defendant himself or is given in an answer to a question asked by him in crossexamination and intended to elicit it. In the united states, federal rule of evidence 404 maps out its permissible and prohibited uses. Bad character evidence the crown prosecution service. What i mean to make clear, though, is that character evidence per seis not subject to any special treatment under the law.
The legal concept of evidence stanford encyclopedia of. The admissibility of hearsay and bad character is governed by the criminal justice act. Bad character and hearsayoverview lexispsl, practical. Please go to your pdf document settings settings advanced settings. R v elkheir up by b in addition to a, xe on rebuttal evidence after seeking leave under s 112 crown c adduce under specific exceptions d xe on credibility evidence under s 103, or 104 if a d 4a. Where the purpose of adducing evidence of similar facts or similar offences was justifiable on the ground of relevancy and necessity to rebut any defence which would otherwise have been open to the accused in addition to those under ss 14 and 15 of the evidence act 1950, evidence of bad character was. Good character evidence of the accused in criminal trials, the accused may adduce evidence of good character, provided it is related to a relevant character trait. This is, however, mainly in the context of bad character rather than good character. Oxford university press online resource centre chapter 17.
The evidence of bad character is an interesting area which have often been brought up by academician and judges like professor hoffman to its disputable and uncertainty of status, and so it have been describe as a law which is complex, unprincipled and riddled with anomalies by professor adrian keane. What is character evidence and when can it be used. The evidence discreditable conduct amendment act 2011 introduced s 34p to the evidence act 1929 sa, to lower the threshold for the admission of bad character evidence referred to as discreditable conduct in the act as circumstantial evidence of guilt through propensity reasoning. The evidence is consider inherently prejudicial for several reasons. If step 1 is satisfied, you must then determine whether the character trait evidence is being offered to show that the person acted, on the day in question, in accordance with their character. The mercy rule allows a criminal defendant to offer evidence of his or her good character as a defense to criminal charges. Section 100 strictly limits how evidence of a nondefendants bad character may become admissible. Evidence of a persons character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait. The act also makes provision for the accused to rely on the bad character of other persons i.
Evidence of a witnesss bad character did not have to amount to proof of a lack of credibility on the part of the witness. The question is whether this is admissible as it could considerably damage the defendants reputation and credibility if they considered to be of bad character. Role of character in evidence law legal service india. The bad character evidence is meant to show the tendency and disposition of the mans mind towards committing or abstaining from committing the class of crime with which he stands charged thus, by adducing evidence of good character the defendant puts his character in issue, notwithstanding whether he takes the witness stand or not. Once evidence has been admitted through one of the gateways, it can be used for any purpose for which it is relevant. In this regard the law commission reports on bad character in 2002. Canadian criminal evidencecharactercharacter of accused. On crossexamination, she denies that several months before the incident at issue she let the tires out of the defendants car. Adducing definition of adducing by the free dictionary.
135 1011 1375 545 1378 986 25 828 1138 920 1107 305 437 722 1190 1444 1055 1276 489 1110 1014 1243 299 1105 139 334 1347 515 562 387 1124 19 467 1293 7 855 325 795